Contemporary Scientific Epistemological Problems and Maqāṣid al-Syarīʿah: Toward a Teleological Framework for Scientific Inquiry
Keywords:
Maqāṣid al-Syarī‘ah, Epistemology, Methodology, Values, Teleology
Abstract
The development of modern science has produced significant advances in knowledge and technology, yet it has also generated epistemological concerns regarding the relationship between facts, values, and the purposes of scientific knowledge. Scientific paradigms emphasizing objectivity and empirical verification often separate descriptive and normative dimensions, leaving the purposes and ethical implications of science beyond scientific methodology. This study aims to explain the role of maqāṣid al-syarīʿah as a meta-methodological framework that complements scientific methodology with normative and teleological orientations. Employing library research with a qualitative approach from the perspective of the philosophy of science, the study analyzes relevant primary and secondary sources on scientific epistemology, philosophy of science, and maqāṣid al-sharīʿah. The findings indicate that maqāṣid al-syarīʿah functions as an orientative, analytical, and evaluative framework without replacing empirical and rational procedures. It guides research priorities toward public welfare, informs the interpretation of data through justice and social responsibility, and provides normative criteria through maṣlaḥah and mafsadah. Thus, maqāṣid al-syarīʿah offers a teleological framework for scientific inquiry that integrates facts, values, and purposes.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Abdullah, M. Amin. “Religion, Science, and Culture: An Integrated, Interconnected Paradigm of Science.” Al-Jami’ah Journal of Islamic Studies 52, no. 1 (2014): 175–203. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2014.521.175-203.
Abdussalam, Izzuddin bin. Qawā’id al-Aḥkām Fī Maṣālih al-Anām. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyyah, 1991.
Al-Amidi, Abu Hasan. Al-Iḥkām Fī Uṣūl al-Ahkām. Beirut: Al-Maktabah al-Islamy, N.Y.
Al-Attas, Syed Muhammad Naquib. Islam and Secularism. Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC, 1993.
———. Prolegomena to the Metaphysics of Islam: An Exposition of the Fundamental Elements of the Worldview of Islam. Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC, 1995.
———. The Concept of Education in Islam: A Framework for an Islamic Philoshophy of Education. Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC, 1999.
———. “Tinjauan Ringkas Peri Ilmu Dan Pandangan Alam.” In Himpunan Risalah. Kuala Lumpur: IBFIM & CASIS, 2015.
Al-Faruqi, Ismail Raji. Islamization of Knowledge. Herndon: IIIT, 1982.
Al-Ghazali, Abu Hamid. Al-Mustaṣfā. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyyah, 1993.
Al-Juwaini, Abu Ma’ali. Al-Burhān Fī Uṣūl al-Fiqh. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyyah, 1997.
Al-Najjar, Abdul Majid. Maqāṣid Al-Syarī‘Ah Bi Ab’Ād al-Jadīdah. Beirut: Dar al-Gharb al-Islamy, 2008.
Al-Qardhawi, Yusuf. Dirāsah Fī Fiqh Maqāṣid Al-Syarī’ah. Cairo: Dar al-Syuruq, 2008.
Al-Raisuni, Ahmad. Naẓariyah Al-Maqāṣid ’Inda al-Imām al-Syāṭibī. Herdon: Al-Ma’had al-Ali li al-Fikr al-Islamy, 1995.
Al-Syatibi, Abu Ishaq. Al-Muwāfaqāt Fī Uṣūl al-Syarī‘ah. Cairo: Dar Ibnu ‘Affan, 1997.
Al-Yubi, Muhammad Sa’ad. Maqāṣid Al-Syarī’ah Al-Islāmiyyah Wa ‘Alāqatuhā Bi al-Adillah al-Syar‘iyyah. Riyad: Dar Ibnu Jauzi, 1430.
Asyuri, Muhammad. “Al-Tarjīḥ Bi al-Maqāṣid: Ḍawābituh Wa Ātsāruh al-Fiqhī.” Tesis, University of Batna, 2008.
Athiyah, Jamaluddin. Naḥwa Taf‘īl Maqāṣid Al-Syarī‘ah. Damaskus: Dar al-Fikr, 2001.
Auda, Jasser. Maqāṣid Al-Syarī‘Ah Dalīl Li al-Mubtadi’Īn. London: Al-Ma’had al-‘Aly li al-Fikr al-Islamy, 2011.
———. Maqāṣid Al-Syarī‘Ah Ka Falsafah al-Tasyrī’ al-Islāmy, Ru’yah Manẓūmah. Trans: Abdul Lathif al-Khayyath. London: Al-Ma’had al-‘Aly li al-Fikr al-Islamy, 2012.
Barbour, Ian G. Religion in an Age of Science: The Gifford Lectures, Volume One. San Fransisco: Harper & Row Publishers, 1990.
Chalmers, Alan F. What Is This Thing Called Science? Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 2013.
Comte, Auguste. The Positive Philoshophy of Auguste Comte. London: Trubner & Co., 1853.
Cresswell, Kathrin M., and Aziz Sheikh. “Key Global Developments in Health Information Technology.” Ournal of the Royal Society of Medicine 109, no. 2 (2016): 299–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0141076816656484.
Douglas, Heather E. “INTRODUCTION: Science Wars and Policy Wars.” In Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal, 1–22. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2009. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt6wrc78.5.
Emmert-Streib, Frank. “From the Digital Data Revolution toward a Digital Society: Pervasiveness of Artificial Intelligence.” Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction 3, no. 1 (2021): 284–98. https://doi.org/10.3390/make3010014.
Golshani, Mehdi. “How to Make Sense of ‘Islamic Science’?” American Journal of Islam and Society 17, no. 3 (2000): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.35632/ajis.v17i3.2044.
Guba, Egon G., and Yvonna S. Lincoln. “Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, 105–17. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994.
Hadi, Sutrisno. Metodologi Reseach. Yogyakarta: Andi Offiset, 1989.
Haught, John F. Science and Religion: From Conflict to Conversation. New York: Paulist Press, 1995.
Helbing, Dirk, Dirk Brockmann, and Matjaž Perc. “Saving Human Lives: What Complexity Science and Information Systems Can Contribute.” Journal of Statistical Physics 158 (2015): 735–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-014-1024-9.
Ibnu Abdurrahman, Abdul Aziz. ‘Ilm Maqāṣid Al-Syāri. Riyad: Maktabah al-Mulk Fahd, 2002.
Ibnu Asyur, Muhammad Thahir. Maqāṣid Al-Syarī‘ah al-Islāmiyyah. Qatar: Wizarah al-Awqaf wa al-Syu’un al-Islamiyah, 2004.
Jughaim, Nu’man. Taysīr Al-Muwāfaqāt Li al-Syāṭibī. Beirut: Dār Ibnu Hazm, 2009.
Kamaluddin, Imam, Amir Sahidin, Setiawan bin Lahuri, and Mohammad Muslih. “The Evolution Of The Maqāṣid Al-Sharī‘ah Paradigm: From A Concept In Ushul Al-Fiqh To A Methodological Approach In Islamic Law.” Hakam: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Ekonomi 10, no. 1 (2026): 150–71. https://doi.org/10.33650/jhi.v10i1.14512.
Kartanegara, Mulyadhi. Essentials of Islamic Epistemology: A Philosophical Inquiry into the Foundations of Knowledge. Bandar Seri Begawan: Universiti Brunei Darussalam Press, 2014.
Khakim, Usmanul, Khasib Amrullah, and Hifni Nasif. “Metode Sains: Membaca Pemikiran Epistemologi Al-Attas Dan Wall.” IJOIS: Indonesian Journal of Islamic Studies 2, no. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.59525/ijois.v2i2.39.
Kuntowijoyo, Kuntowijoyo. Islam Sebagai Ilmu: Epistemologi, Metodologi, Dan Etika. Bandung: Teraju, 2024.
Lakatos, Imre. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1970.
Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. London: Penguin Books, 1997.
Mahzar, Armahedi. Merumuskan Paradigma Sains Dan Teknologi Islami, Revolusi Integralisme Islam. Bandung: Mizan, 2004.
Mouton, Jean-Pierre. How to Succeed in Your Master’s and Doctoral Studies: A South African Guide and Resource Book. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers, 2001.
Muslih, Mohammad. “Al-Qur’an Dan Lahirnya Sains Teistik.” Tsaqafah: Jurnal Peradaban Islam 12, no. 2 (2016): 257–80. https://doi.org/10.21111/tsaqafah.v12i2.756.
———. Falsafah Sains: Dari Isu Integrasi Keilmuan Menuju Lahirnya Sains Teistik. Yogyakarta: Lembaga Studi Filsfat Islam, 2017.
———. “Integrasi Keilmuan; Isu Mutakhir Filsafat Ilmu.” Kalimah: Jurnal Studi Agama Dan Pemikiran Islam 14, no. 2 (2016): 245–72. https://doi.org/10.21111/klm.v14i2.615.
———. Menuju Teologi Sains. Ponorogo: Unida Gontor Press, 2025.
———. “Pengembangan Sains Islam Dalam Perspektif Metodologi Program Riset Lakatosian (Survei Kritis Atas Karya Dosen UIN Malang Dan UIN Yogya).” Disertasi, UIN Sunan Kalijaga, 2017.
———. Pengetahuan Intuitif Model Husserl & Suhrawardi. Ponorogo: CIOS, 2010.
———. Potret Pengembangan Islamisasi Ilmu Pengetahuan Di Unida Gontor: Pondasi, Paradigma, Dan Implementasi. Ponorogo: Unida Gontor Press, 2025.
Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. Knowledge and the Sacred. New York: State University of New York Press, 1989.
———. The Need for Sacred Science. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005.
Nidzom, Muhammad Faqih. Pengantar Islamisasi Ilmu Pengetahuan. Ponorogo: Program Pascasarjana UNIDA Gontor, 2024.
Nidzom, Muhammad Faqih, Hamid Fahmy Zarkasyi, and Setiawan bin Lahuri. Merumuskan Rangka Kerja Islamisasi Ilmu Pengetahuan: Islamisasi Worldview, Paradigma, Dan Teori. Ponorogo: Unida Gontor Press, 2023.
O’Brien, John T., and Cassidy Nelson. “Assessing the Risks Posed by the Convergence of Artificial Intelligence and Biotechnology.” Health Security 18, no. 3 (2020): 219–27. https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2019.0122.
Putnam, Hilary. The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002.
Safi, Louay. The Foundation of Knowledge: A Comparative Study in Islamic and Western Methods of Inquiry. London: IIIT, 2014.
Sahidin, Amir. “Framework Studi Maqashid Al-Syari’ah; Antara Penalaran Tekstual Dan Kontekstual.” Al-Jabiri: Jurnal Ilmiah Studi Islam 1, no. 2 (2022): 87–110, https://www.das-institute.com/journal/index.php/al-jabiri/article/view/230.
Sahidin, Amir, and Imam Kamaluddin. “An Examination of Maqashid Al-Shari’ah between Textual and Contextual Reasoning (Descriptive Analysis Study).” Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum 20, no. 2 (2024): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.32332/istinbath.v20i02.4830.
Sahidin, Amir, and Mohammad Muslih. “Al-I’jaz al-’Ilmi Al-Qur’an Dan Pengembangan Sains.” Prosiding Integrasi Interkoneksi Islam Dan Sains 4 (2022): 279–85. https://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/saintek/kiiis/article/view/3174.
———. “Pengembangan Sains Berorientasi Maqashid Syariah.” Prosiding Integrasi Interkoneksi Islam Dan Sains 6 (2025): 223–31. https://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/saintek/kiiis/article/view/4786.
Sahidin, Amir, Mohammad Muslih, and Setiawan bin Lahuri. “Al-Attas’ Islamization of Science in Lakatosian Research Program Perspective.” Jadwa: Jurnal Studi Islam 5, no. 2 (n.d.): 313–29. https://doi.org/10.38073/aljadwa.4466.
Sardar, Ziauddin. “Arguments for an Islamic Science.” In How Do You Know: Reading Ziauddin Sardar on Islam, Science and Cultural Relations, edited by Ehsan Masood. London: Pluto Press, 2006.
Schick, Jr., Theodore. Readings in the Philosophy of Science: From Positivism to Postmodernism. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company, 2000.
Sinha, Raj. “The Role and Impact of New Technologies on Healthcare Systems.” Discover Health Systems 3, no. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44250-024-00163-w.
Surakhmad, Winarno. Dasar Dan Teknik Research. Bandung: Tarsito, 1978.
Tonn, Bruce Edward, and Dorian Stiefel. “Anticipating the Unanticipated-Unintended Consequences of Scientific and Technological Purposive Actions.” World Futures Review 11, no. 1 (2019): 19–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1946756718789413.
Văidean, Viorela Ligia, and Monica Violeta Achim. “When More Is Less: Do Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) Improve Health Outcomes? An Empirical Investigation in a Non-Linear Framework.” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 80 (2022): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2021.101218.
Waelbers, Katinka. “Technological Delegation: Responsibility for the Unintended.” Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (2009): 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-008-9098-x.
Wall, Thomas F. Thinking Critically about Philosophical Problems. London: Thompson Learning, 2001.
Abdussalam, Izzuddin bin. Qawā’id al-Aḥkām Fī Maṣālih al-Anām. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyyah, 1991.
Al-Amidi, Abu Hasan. Al-Iḥkām Fī Uṣūl al-Ahkām. Beirut: Al-Maktabah al-Islamy, N.Y.
Al-Attas, Syed Muhammad Naquib. Islam and Secularism. Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC, 1993.
———. Prolegomena to the Metaphysics of Islam: An Exposition of the Fundamental Elements of the Worldview of Islam. Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC, 1995.
———. The Concept of Education in Islam: A Framework for an Islamic Philoshophy of Education. Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC, 1999.
———. “Tinjauan Ringkas Peri Ilmu Dan Pandangan Alam.” In Himpunan Risalah. Kuala Lumpur: IBFIM & CASIS, 2015.
Al-Faruqi, Ismail Raji. Islamization of Knowledge. Herndon: IIIT, 1982.
Al-Ghazali, Abu Hamid. Al-Mustaṣfā. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyyah, 1993.
Al-Juwaini, Abu Ma’ali. Al-Burhān Fī Uṣūl al-Fiqh. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyyah, 1997.
Al-Najjar, Abdul Majid. Maqāṣid Al-Syarī‘Ah Bi Ab’Ād al-Jadīdah. Beirut: Dar al-Gharb al-Islamy, 2008.
Al-Qardhawi, Yusuf. Dirāsah Fī Fiqh Maqāṣid Al-Syarī’ah. Cairo: Dar al-Syuruq, 2008.
Al-Raisuni, Ahmad. Naẓariyah Al-Maqāṣid ’Inda al-Imām al-Syāṭibī. Herdon: Al-Ma’had al-Ali li al-Fikr al-Islamy, 1995.
Al-Syatibi, Abu Ishaq. Al-Muwāfaqāt Fī Uṣūl al-Syarī‘ah. Cairo: Dar Ibnu ‘Affan, 1997.
Al-Yubi, Muhammad Sa’ad. Maqāṣid Al-Syarī’ah Al-Islāmiyyah Wa ‘Alāqatuhā Bi al-Adillah al-Syar‘iyyah. Riyad: Dar Ibnu Jauzi, 1430.
Asyuri, Muhammad. “Al-Tarjīḥ Bi al-Maqāṣid: Ḍawābituh Wa Ātsāruh al-Fiqhī.” Tesis, University of Batna, 2008.
Athiyah, Jamaluddin. Naḥwa Taf‘īl Maqāṣid Al-Syarī‘ah. Damaskus: Dar al-Fikr, 2001.
Auda, Jasser. Maqāṣid Al-Syarī‘Ah Dalīl Li al-Mubtadi’Īn. London: Al-Ma’had al-‘Aly li al-Fikr al-Islamy, 2011.
———. Maqāṣid Al-Syarī‘Ah Ka Falsafah al-Tasyrī’ al-Islāmy, Ru’yah Manẓūmah. Trans: Abdul Lathif al-Khayyath. London: Al-Ma’had al-‘Aly li al-Fikr al-Islamy, 2012.
Barbour, Ian G. Religion in an Age of Science: The Gifford Lectures, Volume One. San Fransisco: Harper & Row Publishers, 1990.
Chalmers, Alan F. What Is This Thing Called Science? Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 2013.
Comte, Auguste. The Positive Philoshophy of Auguste Comte. London: Trubner & Co., 1853.
Cresswell, Kathrin M., and Aziz Sheikh. “Key Global Developments in Health Information Technology.” Ournal of the Royal Society of Medicine 109, no. 2 (2016): 299–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0141076816656484.
Douglas, Heather E. “INTRODUCTION: Science Wars and Policy Wars.” In Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal, 1–22. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2009. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt6wrc78.5.
Emmert-Streib, Frank. “From the Digital Data Revolution toward a Digital Society: Pervasiveness of Artificial Intelligence.” Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction 3, no. 1 (2021): 284–98. https://doi.org/10.3390/make3010014.
Golshani, Mehdi. “How to Make Sense of ‘Islamic Science’?” American Journal of Islam and Society 17, no. 3 (2000): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.35632/ajis.v17i3.2044.
Guba, Egon G., and Yvonna S. Lincoln. “Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, 105–17. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994.
Hadi, Sutrisno. Metodologi Reseach. Yogyakarta: Andi Offiset, 1989.
Haught, John F. Science and Religion: From Conflict to Conversation. New York: Paulist Press, 1995.
Helbing, Dirk, Dirk Brockmann, and Matjaž Perc. “Saving Human Lives: What Complexity Science and Information Systems Can Contribute.” Journal of Statistical Physics 158 (2015): 735–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-014-1024-9.
Ibnu Abdurrahman, Abdul Aziz. ‘Ilm Maqāṣid Al-Syāri. Riyad: Maktabah al-Mulk Fahd, 2002.
Ibnu Asyur, Muhammad Thahir. Maqāṣid Al-Syarī‘ah al-Islāmiyyah. Qatar: Wizarah al-Awqaf wa al-Syu’un al-Islamiyah, 2004.
Jughaim, Nu’man. Taysīr Al-Muwāfaqāt Li al-Syāṭibī. Beirut: Dār Ibnu Hazm, 2009.
Kamaluddin, Imam, Amir Sahidin, Setiawan bin Lahuri, and Mohammad Muslih. “The Evolution Of The Maqāṣid Al-Sharī‘ah Paradigm: From A Concept In Ushul Al-Fiqh To A Methodological Approach In Islamic Law.” Hakam: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Ekonomi 10, no. 1 (2026): 150–71. https://doi.org/10.33650/jhi.v10i1.14512.
Kartanegara, Mulyadhi. Essentials of Islamic Epistemology: A Philosophical Inquiry into the Foundations of Knowledge. Bandar Seri Begawan: Universiti Brunei Darussalam Press, 2014.
Khakim, Usmanul, Khasib Amrullah, and Hifni Nasif. “Metode Sains: Membaca Pemikiran Epistemologi Al-Attas Dan Wall.” IJOIS: Indonesian Journal of Islamic Studies 2, no. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.59525/ijois.v2i2.39.
Kuntowijoyo, Kuntowijoyo. Islam Sebagai Ilmu: Epistemologi, Metodologi, Dan Etika. Bandung: Teraju, 2024.
Lakatos, Imre. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1970.
Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. London: Penguin Books, 1997.
Mahzar, Armahedi. Merumuskan Paradigma Sains Dan Teknologi Islami, Revolusi Integralisme Islam. Bandung: Mizan, 2004.
Mouton, Jean-Pierre. How to Succeed in Your Master’s and Doctoral Studies: A South African Guide and Resource Book. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers, 2001.
Muslih, Mohammad. “Al-Qur’an Dan Lahirnya Sains Teistik.” Tsaqafah: Jurnal Peradaban Islam 12, no. 2 (2016): 257–80. https://doi.org/10.21111/tsaqafah.v12i2.756.
———. Falsafah Sains: Dari Isu Integrasi Keilmuan Menuju Lahirnya Sains Teistik. Yogyakarta: Lembaga Studi Filsfat Islam, 2017.
———. “Integrasi Keilmuan; Isu Mutakhir Filsafat Ilmu.” Kalimah: Jurnal Studi Agama Dan Pemikiran Islam 14, no. 2 (2016): 245–72. https://doi.org/10.21111/klm.v14i2.615.
———. Menuju Teologi Sains. Ponorogo: Unida Gontor Press, 2025.
———. “Pengembangan Sains Islam Dalam Perspektif Metodologi Program Riset Lakatosian (Survei Kritis Atas Karya Dosen UIN Malang Dan UIN Yogya).” Disertasi, UIN Sunan Kalijaga, 2017.
———. Pengetahuan Intuitif Model Husserl & Suhrawardi. Ponorogo: CIOS, 2010.
———. Potret Pengembangan Islamisasi Ilmu Pengetahuan Di Unida Gontor: Pondasi, Paradigma, Dan Implementasi. Ponorogo: Unida Gontor Press, 2025.
Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. Knowledge and the Sacred. New York: State University of New York Press, 1989.
———. The Need for Sacred Science. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005.
Nidzom, Muhammad Faqih. Pengantar Islamisasi Ilmu Pengetahuan. Ponorogo: Program Pascasarjana UNIDA Gontor, 2024.
Nidzom, Muhammad Faqih, Hamid Fahmy Zarkasyi, and Setiawan bin Lahuri. Merumuskan Rangka Kerja Islamisasi Ilmu Pengetahuan: Islamisasi Worldview, Paradigma, Dan Teori. Ponorogo: Unida Gontor Press, 2023.
O’Brien, John T., and Cassidy Nelson. “Assessing the Risks Posed by the Convergence of Artificial Intelligence and Biotechnology.” Health Security 18, no. 3 (2020): 219–27. https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2019.0122.
Putnam, Hilary. The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002.
Safi, Louay. The Foundation of Knowledge: A Comparative Study in Islamic and Western Methods of Inquiry. London: IIIT, 2014.
Sahidin, Amir. “Framework Studi Maqashid Al-Syari’ah; Antara Penalaran Tekstual Dan Kontekstual.” Al-Jabiri: Jurnal Ilmiah Studi Islam 1, no. 2 (2022): 87–110, https://www.das-institute.com/journal/index.php/al-jabiri/article/view/230.
Sahidin, Amir, and Imam Kamaluddin. “An Examination of Maqashid Al-Shari’ah between Textual and Contextual Reasoning (Descriptive Analysis Study).” Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum 20, no. 2 (2024): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.32332/istinbath.v20i02.4830.
Sahidin, Amir, and Mohammad Muslih. “Al-I’jaz al-’Ilmi Al-Qur’an Dan Pengembangan Sains.” Prosiding Integrasi Interkoneksi Islam Dan Sains 4 (2022): 279–85. https://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/saintek/kiiis/article/view/3174.
———. “Pengembangan Sains Berorientasi Maqashid Syariah.” Prosiding Integrasi Interkoneksi Islam Dan Sains 6 (2025): 223–31. https://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/saintek/kiiis/article/view/4786.
Sahidin, Amir, Mohammad Muslih, and Setiawan bin Lahuri. “Al-Attas’ Islamization of Science in Lakatosian Research Program Perspective.” Jadwa: Jurnal Studi Islam 5, no. 2 (n.d.): 313–29. https://doi.org/10.38073/aljadwa.4466.
Sardar, Ziauddin. “Arguments for an Islamic Science.” In How Do You Know: Reading Ziauddin Sardar on Islam, Science and Cultural Relations, edited by Ehsan Masood. London: Pluto Press, 2006.
Schick, Jr., Theodore. Readings in the Philosophy of Science: From Positivism to Postmodernism. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company, 2000.
Sinha, Raj. “The Role and Impact of New Technologies on Healthcare Systems.” Discover Health Systems 3, no. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44250-024-00163-w.
Surakhmad, Winarno. Dasar Dan Teknik Research. Bandung: Tarsito, 1978.
Tonn, Bruce Edward, and Dorian Stiefel. “Anticipating the Unanticipated-Unintended Consequences of Scientific and Technological Purposive Actions.” World Futures Review 11, no. 1 (2019): 19–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1946756718789413.
Văidean, Viorela Ligia, and Monica Violeta Achim. “When More Is Less: Do Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) Improve Health Outcomes? An Empirical Investigation in a Non-Linear Framework.” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 80 (2022): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2021.101218.
Waelbers, Katinka. “Technological Delegation: Responsibility for the Unintended.” Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (2009): 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-008-9098-x.
Wall, Thomas F. Thinking Critically about Philosophical Problems. London: Thompson Learning, 2001.
Published
2026-10-29
How to Cite
Sahidin, A., Muslih, M., & Lahuri, S. (2026). Contemporary Scientific Epistemological Problems and Maqāṣid al-Syarīʿah: Toward a Teleological Framework for Scientific Inquiry. Islamic Review: Jurnal Riset Dan Kajian Keislaman, 15(2), 321-346. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35878/islamicreview.v15i2.2430
Section
Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Pemberitahuan Hak Cipta
Penulis yang menerbitkan bersama Islamic Review: Jurnal Riset dan Kajian Keislaman menyetujui ketentuan berikut:
- Penulis mempertahankan hak cipta dan memberikan jurnal hak publikasi pertama dengan karya yang dilisensikan secara bersamaan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) yang memungkinkan orang lain untuk berbagi karya dengan pengakuan kepenulisan karya dan publikasi awal dalam jurnal ini.
- Penulis dapat membuat pengaturan kontrak tambahan yang terpisah untuk distribusi non-eksklusif dari versi jurnal yang diterbitkan dari karya tersebut (misalnya, mempostingnya ke repositori institusi atau menerbitkannya dalam sebuah buku), dengan pengakuan awal publikasi di jurnal ini.
- Penulis diizinkan dan didorong untuk memposting karya mereka secara online (misalnya, di repositori institusional atau di situs web mereka) sebelum dan selama proses pengiriman, karena dapat menghasilkan pertukaran yang produktif, serta kutipan lebih awal dan lebih besar dari karya yang diterbitkan.
Karya ini dilisensikan di bawah Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
