Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim dalam Penetapan Perkawinan Beda Agama: Analisis Fenomenologi dan Maqashid Syari’ah atas Putusan Nomor 916/Pdt.P/2022/PN.Sby

Judicial Reasoning on Interfaith Marriage Approval: A Phenomenological and Maqashid Shariah Analysis of Decision No. 916/Pdt.P/2022/PN.Sby

  • Syifa Maulani Universitas Islam Negeri Salatiga
  • Arif Dika Prasetya Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
Keywords: Interfaith Marriage, Phenomenology, Maqashid Shariah, Hifz al-Din

Abstract

Court rulings approving interfaith marriages continue to spark juridical and religious debate in Indonesia. This study aims to analyze the judicial reasoning and legal considerations in Decision Number 916/Pdt.P/2022/PN.Sby through the combined analytical lenses of Alfred Schutz's phenomenology and Maqashid Shariah. Using a qualitative normative-juridical approach based on document study of court decision transcripts, the findings reveal that through Schutz's phenomenological lens, the judge's reasoning was driven by an "in order to motive" to provide civil legal certainty and safeguard the applicants' constitutional rights, as well as a "because motive" grounded in a mature personal relationship, social context, and parental consent. However, viewed from Maqashid Shariah (Hifz al-Din and Hifz al-Nasl), the ruling predominantly prioritizes administrative procedures and individual human rights while overlooking long-term implications for family religious preservation, guardianship, and the civil status of offspring. This study concludes that accommodating civil rights via judicial discretion creates legal protection for applicants yet leaves gaps regarding Islamic Shariah protections.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agung, Mahkamah. Putusan Mahkaah Agung Republik Indonesia, Penetapan Nomor 916/Pdt.P/2022/PN.Sby. (2022).
Al-Syatibi, Abu Ishaq. Al-Muwafaqat Fi Ushul Al-Syariah, Jil. II. Beirut: Dar al-Ma’rifah, 1996.
Amirudin, and Zainal Asikin. Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2012.
Amri, Aulil. “Perkawinan Beda Agama Menurut Hukum Positif Dan Hukum Islam.” Media Syari’ah 22, no. 1 (2020). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22373/jms.v22i1.6719.
Arifin, Zainal. “Perkawinan Beda Agama.” Al-Insyiroh 2, no. 1 (2018): 161–81.
Asiah, Nur. “Kajian Hukum Terhadap Perkawinan Beda Agama Menurut Undang-Undang Perkawinan Dan Hukum Islam.” Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan 10, no. 2 (2015).
Daus, Candra Refan, and Ismail Marzuki. “Perkawinan Beda Agama Di Indonesia; Perspektif Yuridis, Agama-Agama Dan Hak Asasi Manusia.” Al-’Adalah 8, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31538/adlh.v8i1.3328.
Efendi, Jonaedi. Rekonstruksi Dasar Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Berbasis Nilai-Nilai Hukum Dan Rasa Keadilan Yang Hidup Dalam Masyarakat. 1st ed. Depok: Prenamedia Group, 2018.
Fahmi, R, and Firdaus. “Pemikiran Imam Al-Syhatibi Tentang Maqashid Al-Syariah.” I’tisham : Journal of Islamic Law and Economics 3, no. 2 (2023): 140–58.
Fatimah, Siti, Nurhadi, and Siany Indria Liestyasari. “Motif ‘Agar’ Dan Motif ‘Karena’ Dalam Putusan Orang Tua Memilih Lembaga Bimbingan Belajar.” Sosialitas:Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Sosiologi Antropologi 5, no. 2 (2016).
Hannan, Hassan Musthofa, and Mesraini. “Diskresi Hakim Sebagai Ruang Interpretasi Dalam Perkara Perkawinan Beda Agama.” Jurnal Riset Hukum Keluarga Islam (JRHKI) 5 (2025): 161–70. https://doi.org/10.29313/jrhki.v5i2.8570.
Hermanto, Yunike Rahma. “Perkawinan Beda Agama Menurut Hukum Positif , Hukum Islam Dan Hak Asasi Manusia Di Indonesia.” Journal of Law, Society, Ad Islamic Civilization 12, no. 1 (2024): 34–48. https://doi.org/10.20961/jolsic.v12i1.851.
Hutabarat, Dany Try Hutama, Komis Simanjuntak, and Syahrunsyah Syahrunsyah. “Pengelabuan Hukum Perkawinan Atas Perkawinan Beda Agama Dany.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 7, no. 2 (2022): 321–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v7i2.5383.
Ilham, Muhammad. “Nikah Beda Agama Dalam Kajian Hukum Islam Dan Tatanan Hukum Nasional.” Taqnin Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum 2, no. 1 (2020): 43–58.
Indonesia, Fatwa Majelis Ulama. Perkawinan Beda Agama, Pub. L. No. 4/MUNAS VII/MUI/8/2005, 472 (2005).
Khaliq, Muhammad Nur, and Aji Pangestu. “Teori Maqasid Syari ’ Ah Klasik ( Asy -Syatibi ).” Risalah: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Studi Islam 11, no. 1 (2025): 149–62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31943/jurnal_risalah.v11i1.1330.
Lubis, Andi Hakim, and Mhd. Hasbi. “Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Dalam Menetapkan Suatu Putusan Di Persidangan Perkara Pidana.” Madani : Jurnal Ilimiah Multisidiplin 1, no. 12 (2024): 356–60.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum, Ed. Rev. 13th ed. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2017.
Miles, Matthew B., A. Michael Huberman, and Johnny Saldana. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 2014.
Mursalin, Ayub. “Legalitas Perkawinan Beda Agama : Mengungkap Disparitas Putusan Pengadilan Di Indonesia.” Undang: Jurnal Hukum 6, no. 1 (2023): 113–50. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.6.1.113-150.
Nindito, Stefanus. “Fenomenologi Alfred Schutz: Studi Tentang Konstruksi Makna Dan Realitas Dalam Ilmu Sosial.” Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi 2, no. 1 (2005): 79–95. https://doi.org/10.24002/jik.v2i1.254.
Prianto, Rocky Eric, Iqbal Nuriswandi, Zaskia Audilia, and Muhammad Ilham Adi Nugroho. “Impelentasi Prinsip Maqashid Syariah Dalam Sistem Hukum Keluarga Islam Kontemporer: Analisis Terhadap Perkembangan Fiqh Munakahat Di Era Modern.” Jurnal Hukum Al Adl Harapan 4 (2025).
Rahmi, Istu, and Zulamri. “Pengaruh Keberfungsian Keluarga Terhadap Pengambilan Keputusan Perkawinan Di KUA Kecamatan Kundur Kabupaten Karimun.” Jurnal Riset Mahasiswa Dakwah Dan Komunikasi 1, no. 2 (2021).
RI. Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan (1974).
RI, Kemenkumham. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman (2009).
Right, United Nation Human. Deklarasi Universal Hak Asasi Manusia (1948).
Rorong, Michael Jibrael. Fenomenologi. 1st ed. Yogyakarta: CV Bud Utama, 2020.
Schutz, Alfred. The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1967.
Sodiqin, Ali. Fiqh Ushul Fiqh, Sejarah, Metodologi Dan Implementasinya Di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Beranda Publishing, 2012.
Soekanto, Soerjono, and Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2015.
Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D. Bandung Alfabeta, 2019.
Supraja, Muhamad, and Nuruddin Al Akbar. Alfred Schutz: Pengarusutamaan Fenomenologi Dalam Tradisi Ilmu Sosial. Edited by Alfiansari Aisyah Putri. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2020.
Togatorop, Andri Rifai. “Perkawinan Beda Agama : Suatu Etis Teologis Tentang Pernikahan Menurut Undang- Undang Pernikahan Agama Kristen Dan Islam.” Journal of Religious and Socio-Cultural 4, no. 1 (2023): 26–36.
Toriquddin, Moh. “Teori Maqashid Syari’ah Persepektif Al-Syatibi.” De Jure: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum 6, no. 1 (2014): 33–47.
Published
2026-10-29
How to Cite
Maulani, S., & Prasetya, A. (2026). Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim dalam Penetapan Perkawinan Beda Agama: Analisis Fenomenologi dan Maqashid Syari’ah atas Putusan Nomor 916/Pdt.P/2022/PN.Sby. Islamic Review: Jurnal Riset Dan Kajian Keislaman, 15(2), 227-246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35878/islamicreview.v15i2.2274
Section
Articles